When Nigeria’s president, Bola Tinubu, signed the Designation and Protection of Critical National Information Infrastructure (CNII) Order in June 2024, the Federal Government aimed to shield telecommunications assets from relentless vandalism and physical damage. By classifying fibre lines, base stations, and data centres as vital national security installations, the order sought to impose deterrent penalties and curb unauthorised tampering.
Yet two years on, chronic breaches continue to impose steep financial penalties on operators, diverting capital from network expansion to nonstop emergency repairs and destabilising internet reliability across the country.
In 2023, before the order, MTN Nigeria suffered more than 6,000 fibre cuts in a single year—averaging roughly 16-17 severed lines per day.
Fast-forward to 2025, past the presidential order: the numbers increased; between January and July, the telco recorded 5,478 fibre cuts. That pushed its daily average to over 26 snapped cables.
In plain terms, instead of scaring reckless diggers and vandals away and improving coordination between construction firms and other key stakeholders, the new rules led MTN Nigeria to fix about eight more broken cables per day than before the order was introduced.
The broader telecoms industry recorded 19,384 cuts between January and August 2025, further pushing the daily average to 80. In the first nine months of 2026 alone, Telecom networks suffered over 44,000 fibre cuts—averaging more than 160 cuts every single day, mostly from uncoordinated road construction, ditch digging, and theft. The primary culprits remain uncoordinated civil engineering projects, road expansions, and persistent vandalism.
These disruptions expose significant enforcement gaps, raising a central question of who ultimately pays when statutory protections fail to stop contractors and vandals from repeatedly severing the nation’s digital backbone
Building on Tinubu’s signing of the executive order, the legal framework establishes vital statutory mechanisms to defend the nation’s digital backbone.

Under the CNII Order, telecommunications assets—including submarine landing cables, terrestrial fibre-optic lines, switching centres, and data storage hubs—are formally designated as vital national security installations.
The framework empowers security agencies, led by the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), to monitor, inspect, and defend digital infrastructure against willful destruction, uncoordinated civil works, and cyber-physical intrusions.
Even so, its ultimate success hinges on swift and consistent prosecution.
Fibre cuts drain expansion capital
Constant network degradation forces telecommunications operators to absorb substantial operational costs, squeezing capital investment. In the first half of 2026, direct repairs across 5,934 fibre incidents cost operators over ₦2.2 billion ($1.64 million).
These emergency expenses undermine the ₦2.13 trillion ($1.58 billion) in capital expenditure committed by network and tower companies, diverting critical resources from new rollouts to restoring existing footprints.
This financial drain has a long track record; it is not new. According to the GSMA Nigeria Digital Economy Report, MTN Nigeria spent ₦11.1 billion ($8.26 million) repairing and relocating 2,502 kilometres of fibre across 2022 and 2023. That figure comprised ₦4.4 billion ($3.27 million) for 1,069 km in 2022 and ₦6.7 billion ($4.98 million) for 1,433 km in 2023—money that GSMA notes could have funded 870 kilometres of greenfield fibre in underserved communities.
Across the wider industry, losses in 2023 alone reached an estimated ₦27 billion ($20.08 million) in direct repairs and lost revenue.
The economic stakes are huge for a country where its ICT sector delivered over ₦6 trillion ($4.46 billion) in real output in Q2 2026, with telecoms contributing 9.72% (₦5.20 trillion / $3.87 billion) to total real GDP: every severed cable is no longer just a temporary network glitch, but an immediate drag on national GDP.
Connectivity gap worsens local challenges
Nigeria’s infrastructure struggles unfold against broader regional constraints. A recent GSMA report on African spectrum policy highlighted that African operators averaged 570 MHz of spectrum below 7 GHz in 2025—far below the global baseline of 750 MHz—while paying 24% more per unit of spectrum. GSMA cautions that every 10% increase in spectrum costs relative to revenue trims 5G coverage expansion by six percentage points.
Fast 5G networks require robust underground cabling to ensure that banking apps, POS machines, and online money transfers work instantly and without failure.
Underlying infrastructure carried massive financial volumes in early 2026: transactions on the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) surpassed ₦1.053 quadrillion ($783.2 billion) in Q1 alone, alongside millions of daily mobile money and point-of-sale payments. Governed by a 23-year-old regulatory model dating back to the 2G voice era, the sector is directly threatened by physical fibre cuts, which directly threaten overall financial stability.
Fibre backhaul links network base stations directly to core data centres. When cables are cut, the impact cascades into dropped voice calls, crippled data throughput, and widespread service outages.
For enterprises, cuts mean payment gateways collapsing, staff hours lost, and cloud downtime. For subscribers, disruptions translate into sluggish connections, failed payments, and paying higher rates for diminished service.
These disruptions compound consumer frustration following the NCC’s tariff revision, which permitted price hikes of up to 50% to offset soaring operational costs. When operators sink recurring revenue into avoidable repairs, network optimisation stalls, and users pay the price through degraded reliability.
Why has the CNII Order not solved the problem?
The NCC acknowledged the continuing challenge of stakeholder coordination in its August 2026 intervention: “Our interests are aligned; what has too often been missing is a dependable system of early coordination,” said the Executive Vice Chairman of the Nigerian Communications Commission, Aminu Maida.
But coordination can only work when manpower is adequate. The NSCDC’s limited manpower and operational resources expose the enforcement challenges facing one of Nigeria’s agencies tasked with protecting critical national infrastructure.
With roughly 63,000 personnel deployed across 774 local government areas to manage a broad range of national security duties, dedicated static protection for thousands of kilometres of buried fibre is logistically impossible. Even with its efforts on surveillance technology and systematic prosecution, legal protection on paper cannot secure infrastructure without adequate personnel.
The government must therefore measure the success of the CNII Order by tangible results: fewer cuts, faster remediation, and lower repair bills. Until enforcement deters would-be offenders, operators will keep burning through capital on repeated repairs instead of expanding coverage—leaving subscribers to foot the bill for an unprotected digital economy.

