Colleges Are Admitting Students Who Never Applied. Here’s What That Doesn’t Fix.

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

Direct admission and holistic review aren’t rivals. Automate the clear-cut eligibility calls; save human judgment for selective programs and students whose records need context.
Direct admission needs reliable data-sharing, clear program rules and staff time.

For decades, college admissions has largely followed the same process. Students identify universities, complete applications, submit academic records and personal essays, and wait for a decision. Direct admission is beginning to reverse that relationship. Instead of waiting for students to apply, universities can proactively offer admission to those who meet predetermined eligibility criteria, removing some of the uncertainty and administrative barriers associated with traditional applications.

The approach is gaining momentum across U.S. higher education. According to the National College Attainment Network, 15 states had established statewide direct admissions programs as of December 2025. A peer-reviewed study examining Idaho’s initiative found that direct admission increased first-time undergraduate enrollment by an estimated 4–8%, with most gains concentrated among two-year, open-access institutions. However, the study found little to no impact on Pell-eligible enrollment, suggesting that simplifying the application process alone may not be sufficient to address existing disparities in college access.

As universities look to expand access and simplify admissions, an important question emerges: how much can the process be streamlined without losing the individual context that makes an application meaningful?

Academic performance can establish whether students meet admission requirements, but it does not always reflect the circumstances in which they achieved those results, the challenges they have overcome, or their potential to succeed in a particular academic environment. A process designed primarily around predetermined eligibility criteria must therefore consider how students whose potential is not fully reflected in their academic records will be evaluated.

This is where the relationship between direct admission and holistic review deserves closer examination. The two approaches need not be mutually exclusive. Direct admission can create a more accessible pathway for students who meet established academic requirements, while holistic review allows universities to consider individual circumstances where a deeper assessment is necessary.

The real opportunity lies in understanding where each approach adds value and how institutions can combine them to make admissions more accessible without compromising the quality of their decisions.

Direct admission removes barriers, not the need for individual assessment

Direct admission works best when eligibility is clear. If an institution knows the academic profile it is looking for, students who meet those requirements should not always have to navigate a long and complicated process before learning whether they are admissible.

The challenge begins when eligibility and suitability are not the same thing.

According to the National Association for College Admission Counseling, 76.8% of responding four-year colleges placed considerable importance on grades in college-preparatory courses, while 63.8% said the same about the strength of a student’s high school curriculum. Those measures are useful, but they can also require context.

A 3.8 GPA, for example, does not carry exactly the same meaning in every school environment. Course availability, grading practices, access to advanced classes, employment responsibilities, and family circumstances can all shape an academic record. This does not make grades less important. It means that there are situations where the numbers alone may not provide enough information.

The distinction becomes even more important for selective programs. A university may be comfortable offering general admission based on clearly defined academic criteria while applying additional review for programs with limited seats, prerequisites, portfolios, auditions, or other requirements.

That creates a more practical model for admissions teams. Routine eligibility decisions can be simplified, while human attention is concentrated on applications where judgment genuinely matters.

The value of direct admission, then, is not that it removes review altogether. It gives institutions an opportunity to decide which decisions require deeper review and which do not.

Direct admission requires more than a change in admissions criteria

Introducing direct admission is relatively straightforward in principle. Making it work across an institution’s existing admissions processes is considerably more complicated. Universities must decide which programs are eligible, how student records will be shared and verified, who makes final admission decisions, and where individual assessment remains necessary.

These practical challenges emerged during the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association’s 2024 policy conference. Wisconsin’s participating universities used high school data to prepopulate applications, with individual institutions setting their own GPA requirements. Georgia, meanwhile, operated a conditional model that invited students to claim a place but still required them to complete the application process and submit supporting records. Both approaches aimed to simplify the path to college, but they involved different administrative processes and levels of student participation.

The distinction matters for institutions considering direct admission alongside holistic review. A university needs clear rules about which decisions can be made using existing academic information and which require additional evaluation. It also needs reliable data-sharing arrangements with schools, consistent communication with applicants, and coordination among admissions teams and academic departments.

There is a resource consideration as well. At the same 2024 conference, an Idaho State Board of Education official explained that the state’s direct admissions program operated on approximately $50,000 annually, primarily for mailing admission letters. That figure did not account for the time contributed by education board employees, high school counselors, and college admissions staff.

This highlights an important point for university leaders. Direct admission may reduce certain application-related tasks, but it also introduces responsibilities that must be carefully planned and adequately supported. Its effectiveness depends not simply on how quickly institutions can extend offers, but on whether their admissions processes can accommodate different academic requirements while preserving appropriate human oversight.

Ultimately, the goal is to build an admissions framework in which administrative efficiency and thoughtful evaluation reinforce each other rather than compete.

Conclusion

The future of college admissions does not have to be a choice between efficiency and individualized evaluation. Direct admission presents an opportunity to reconsider processes that have traditionally required significant time and effort from both students and institutions. However, its success depends on how thoughtfully universities integrate it into their broader admissions strategies.

Rather than applying the same level of scrutiny to every application, institutions can establish clear eligibility pathways while retaining holistic review for decisions that require greater context and individual judgment. Doing so requires reliable student data, cross-department coordination, and transparency about how admission decisions are made.

Ultimately, a more effective admissions process should make college easier to access without making admission decisions less meaningful. Universities that achieve this balance can reduce unnecessary administrative complexity while preserving the academic standards and individualized consideration that remain central to higher education.

Effective product pages help online shoppers decide whether an item fits their needs and what buying it involves. A beautiful photograph gets attention. Product details such as dimensions, available sizes, delivery details, and a clear price help turn that attention into a purchase.

Even established retailers miss these basics. In its benchmark of leading U.S. and European retailers, updated in March 2026, Baymard Institute rated 52% of desktop sites and 62% of mobile sites “mediocre or worse” for product-page usability¹.

Product-page changes can affect revenue, too. In a 27-day test for Life Pro Fitness, agency Media Contour made product images, key details, and buying buttons visible without needing to scroll. Testing vendor Wingify reported that the revised page generated $0.67 more revenue per visitor than the original².

If you are building a new store, follow the five tips below as you create your product pages. Have those pages ready before running ads that send shoppers to them.

If you already have an online store, choose one product page to improve. Reference these steps to check whether it answers shoppers’ questions and lets them add the right item to their cart.

1. Answer shoppers’ questions in the product description

Identify the main question a shopper needs answered before buying. Look for questions customers ask repeatedly or misunderstandings behind returns. For a new product, start with fit, compatibility, or what is included. Confirm the answer against your product specifications, then put it near the start of the description.

For example, consider a pet-supply retailer selling a dog harness. Someone choosing their first harness needs measurements and adjustment details to judge the fit. Someone replacing a harness they already own needs to recognize the same model and size. The page should make both tasks straightforward.

Also, use consistent labels and units across similar products to make comparisons easier. Include limitations, such as incompatible models or items sold separately, so shoppers can rule out an unsuitable purchase.

In e-commerce platform BigCommerce, for instance, online sellers can use the product description and custom fields—additional facts such as material or compatibility—to present these details. Preview the product page to check that shoppers can find the information they need.

Then, use those same facts to help shoppers recognize the item in search results. In BigCommerce’s page title field, use the product name and a relevant detail, such as its model or material. Avoid repeating keywords or giving every product the same title.

2. Give every product image a question to answer

Plan your gallery around what someone needs to inspect. Show the whole product, a useful detail, and the product in use. For example, a lighting retailer could photograph a lamp beside a chair to show its scale and how it lights a reading space. A close-up of the switch shows how someone would operate it. Together, these images help shoppers picture using the lamp at home. Keep written dimensions available as well.

The same Baymard overview describes how shoppers use images to judge size and can struggle when photographs lack a familiar reference.

If you sell a bundle, make clear which pictured items are included. For products that need assembly or demonstration, you might even consider creating a short video. Add alt text: a short description of the useful information in an image. Screen-reader software can read that description aloud or present it in braille. Keep essential instructions available as text as well.

BigCommerce supports product images, images for variants such as different colors, and YouTube-hosted product videos. Check that your gallery presents the right item as shoppers change their selection.

3. Make choices, prices, and recurring charges clear

Keep size, color, quantity, and purchase options close to the buying button. Label them plainly, show the current selection, and make unavailable choices recognizable. If the size options fit on the screen, show them as labeled buttons, such as S, M, and L. This lets shoppers see which sizes are available without opening a menu, as the Baymard overview explains.

Place helpful links beside the choice it explains. For the dog harness, for example, consider putting a measurement guide beside the size selector so shoppers can check the fit before choosing. Keep it visible or provide a clearly labeled link that works by touch and keyboard.

In BigCommerce, online sellers can configure choices such as size and color through product variants and options. Then check that the displayed price and availability match the shopper’s selection. For multipacks, show both the pack total and the unit price. Make the full pack price easy to find so shoppers know what they will be charged.

If you offer subscriptions, let shoppers explicitly choose between a one-time purchase and a recurring order. Put the recurring charge, delivery frequency, and change or cancellation terms beside that choice so shoppers can compare the commitments before selecting. Confirm that these terms match how your subscription service works. Select a subscription yourself and verify that checkout shows the plan, price, and frequency you chose.

4. Make sure delivery, returns, and reviews are easy to find

A shopper who needs an item by a particular date wants to know whether it will arrive in time. Show a delivery estimate for their destination. Put a short explanation of shipping and returns near add to cart, with links to the full policies.

Show shipping fees or explain how they will be calculated. Clearly describe return windows, fees, and exclusions that matter for the item. If pickup is offered, distinguish stock at the selected location from stock elsewhere. Avoid presenting an estimate as a confirmed promise.

Also consider making reassurances that are specific to the purchase. Using the dog harness as an example again, you’d want to explain whether a shopper can exchange it if the fit is wrong and which conditions apply. That answers the practical concerns that a badge saying “Shop with Confidence” leaves unresolved. Use only promises your business can honor.

Customer reviews provide another way to assess the product. Show the review rating, text, reviewer’s display name, and date on the relevant product page. If reviews come from another service, name that service. These details help shoppers understand whose experience they are reading and how recent it is.

5. Test the path from product page to cart

Shoppers need to know that the page has registered their choices and whether adding an item succeeded. Open your chosen product page on your phone. If a required option starts unselected, try adding the item before choosing it. The page should tell you what to select or explain why “Add to cart” is unavailable.

If the product has options, choose them, then change one selection. Check that the price, availability, and any option-specific images match. Add the item. While the request is processing, the page should make that clear. Once it succeeds, a confirmation or the cart itself should show what was added. If an error occurs, it should explain how to continue without losing other selections.

From there, make sure to check the item’s quantity, options, and price in the cart. If you chose a size or color, return to the product page and check whether it still shows that selection. These checks help catch a wrong selection or an uncertain result before a shopper encounters it.

Shoppers who cannot use a mouse need to select options and add products using a keyboard. To check that they can, repeat the steps above on a computer without the mouse. Use Tab to move forward between controls and Shift+Tab to move back. A visible outline or other marker should show which control you are about to use. Press Enter to activate links and Enter or Space for buttons. In a drop-down list, such as a size selector, use the arrow keys to move through the options.

Shoppers who need larger text must still be able to read product details and reach Add to cart. Use the browser’s Zoom control to enlarge the page to 200% and try the same steps again. Check for overlapping text or controls that disappear. Across all these checks, record anything that prevents choosing the product, adding it, or correcting a mistake.

Keep improving one page at a time

Clear facts and images help shoppers judge the product; clear choices, terms, and working controls help them act on that decision. Choose one issue from your review to fix first. Give priority to a problem that prevents adding the correct item to the cart. If shoppers can add the correct item, address an unanswered question that could lead someone to buy the wrong product.

Record what you changed and when. If you have sales reports, compare purchases and revenue for the product over equal periods before and after the change. Note any promotions or changes in visitor numbers that could also explain the results. Customer questions, order corrections, and return reasons can help you check whether the same misunderstanding persists.

For more examples, explore BigCommerce’s product-page guide, then apply the same review to the next product page.

¹^{Product Page UX 2026: 10 Pitfalls and Best Practices}^{(Baymard Institute)
2}^{Media Contour uses split URL testing to improve the revenue from product pages}^(Wingify)

Business